FlatPress 0.1010.0 Sotto Voce is here!
Shht, don’t tell anyone!
(changelog is soon to come; this is SVN 373)
– sorry for the brief post, I’m very busy at the moment!
Friday, November 5, 2010
Add comment
Fill out the form below to add your own comments
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 09:59:17
Thanks for your effort to keep Flatpress up-to-date. I’m glad to use it.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 10:24:45
A big thankyou from me as well, dear NoWhereMan, and to also Laborix for maintaining the “tedesco” parts…
Just upgraded my blog and it’s still running… :-)
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 10:59:47
Thanks.. You are doing some great work.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 11:30:30
Thanx So much :) .I would like to know though if anyone has problems removing comments like i do.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 12:43:22
I just upgraded both blogs. Thank you very much…
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 13:26:03
Very nice. Thanks
Sunday, November 7, 2010 - 17:27:48
Updated, thank you so much :-)
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 05:49:38
Thank you guys :)
@Black: I’ve fixed already the comments bug. Drop in /admin/panel/entry/
this updated copy of
/admin/panels/entry/admin.entry.commentlist.tpl
http://bit.ly/bWJROD
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 08:08:14
The version numbering is highly confusing: Version 0.909 is followed by version 0.1010?
Yes, I do realize that there is an extra digit and draw my conclusions, but any regular persion will read that number as a decimal place, i.e. something like 0.1. And that would be some pre-alpha release which is extremely unsafe for use.
So why not stay in the 0.9x band or boldly go to 1.0?
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 08:54:35
@Matthias: even though it *is* a bit counterintuitive,
the version should be parsed this way:
MAJOR.MINOR.MINORMINOR
so Major Version is still 0, while Minor is 1010 (and Minor Minor version is 0 at the moment)
It is not a decimal point, it is a “separator”.
Minor always reads as YMo where Y is the year and Mo is the month. This year Y went two digits because “0” for ‘10 was meaningless ;)
I didn’t feel like going 1.010 because I don’t feel like FP is feature complete for a 1.0 version… when i went for this versioning scheme I believed FP would be complete for 2010… but I’m never satisfied ;)
If it’s really that confusing I’ll bump the version number starting from the next minor release (0.1010.1 -> 1.010.1)
Tuesday, November 9, 2010 - 06:59:07
Hi there! FP is very cool :-)
…but how can I upgrade 0.909 to 1.01?
What I have to do? Is there a guide?
Can’t finde informations in the wiki…
Marty McFly
Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 08:13:10
@McFly
You can read on the forum http://flatpress.org/vanilla2/discussion/560/howto-update
Sunday, November 14, 2010 - 17:08:00
Cool, thanks for the new version! I’m eager to see the Changelog!
Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 05:56:16
great work, thanks a lot!
cy-man
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 14:26:39
@ Lantaca: Thank you! :)
Saturday, December 4, 2010 - 12:26:23
Thank you Nowereman… that’s very nice..
Monday, January 10, 2011 - 16:16:22
Thanks, Nowhereman.
It is beautiful.
Don’t lose any sleep over the numbering. (It’s not important.)
Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 10:44:21
Hi NoWhereMan,
Thank you so much for wonderful Flatpress from Germany. Yesterday I installed and tested it, everything works fine, and I could not stop writing and writing. Today I am still writing in that first Flatpress-Blog and am trying different themes. This is the first blog-system that I can really recommend to interested customers. And it is easy to backup or to remove to a different webspace. I am so delighted!
Tuesday, February 1, 2011 - 08:21:09
Thanks.. You are doing some great work.
Best regards from Greenland :-) Eric
Tuesday, February 15, 2011 - 15:59:46
Holy Moly… the new Version of Flatpress really rocks!
Good jobs and don’t stop working on this great projekt!
Wednesday, June 29, 2011 - 05:47:46
Thanks.. Great work.
regards from amsterdam