Shht, don’t tell anyone!
(changelog is soon to come; this is SVN 373)
– sorry for the brief post, I’m very busy at the moment!
Shht, don’t tell anyone!
(changelog is soon to come; this is SVN 373)
– sorry for the brief post, I’m very busy at the moment!
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 13:59:17
Thanks for your effort to keep Flatpress up-to-date. I’m glad to use it.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 14:24:45
A big thankyou from me as well, dear NoWhereMan, and to also Laborix for maintaining the “tedesco” parts…
Just upgraded my blog and it’s still running… :-)
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 14:59:47
Thanks.. You are doing some great work.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 15:30:30
Thanx So much :) .I would like to know though if anyone has problems removing comments like i do.
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 16:43:22
I just upgraded both blogs. Thank you very much…
Saturday, November 6, 2010 - 17:26:03
Very nice. Thanks
Sunday, November 7, 2010 - 22:27:48
Updated, thank you so much :-)
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 10:49:38
Thank you guys :)
@Black: I’ve fixed already the comments bug. Drop in /admin/panel/entry/
this updated copy of
/admin/panels/entry/admin.entry.commentlist.tpl
http://bit.ly/bWJROD
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 13:08:14
The version numbering is highly confusing: Version 0.909 is followed by version 0.1010?
Yes, I do realize that there is an extra digit and draw my conclusions, but any regular persion will read that number as a decimal place, i.e. something like 0.1. And that would be some pre-alpha release which is extremely unsafe for use.
So why not stay in the 0.9x band or boldly go to 1.0?
Monday, November 8, 2010 - 13:54:35
@Matthias: even though it *is* a bit counterintuitive,
the version should be parsed this way:
MAJOR.MINOR.MINORMINOR
so Major Version is still 0, while Minor is 1010 (and Minor Minor version is 0 at the moment)
It is not a decimal point, it is a “separator”.
Minor always reads as YMo where Y is the year and Mo is the month. This year Y went two digits because “0” for ‘10 was meaningless ;)
I didn’t feel like going 1.010 because I don’t feel like FP is feature complete for a 1.0 version… when i went for this versioning scheme I believed FP would be complete for 2010… but I’m never satisfied ;)
If it’s really that confusing I’ll bump the version number starting from the next minor release (0.1010.1 -> 1.010.1)
Tuesday, November 9, 2010 - 11:59:07
Hi there! FP is very cool :-)
…but how can I upgrade 0.909 to 1.01?
What I have to do? Is there a guide?
Can’t finde informations in the wiki…
Marty McFly
Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 13:13:10
@McFly
You can read on the forum http://flatpress.org/vanilla2/discussion/560/howto-update
Sunday, November 14, 2010 - 22:08:00
Cool, thanks for the new version! I’m eager to see the Changelog!
Wednesday, November 17, 2010 - 10:56:16
great work, thanks a lot!
cy-man
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 19:26:39
@ Lantaca: Thank you! :)
Saturday, December 4, 2010 - 17:26:23
Thank you Nowereman… that’s very nice..
Monday, January 10, 2011 - 21:16:22
Thanks, Nowhereman.
It is beautiful.
Don’t lose any sleep over the numbering. (It’s not important.)
Thursday, January 27, 2011 - 15:44:21
Hi NoWhereMan,
Thank you so much for wonderful Flatpress from Germany. Yesterday I installed and tested it, everything works fine, and I could not stop writing and writing. Today I am still writing in that first Flatpress-Blog and am trying different themes. This is the first blog-system that I can really recommend to interested customers. And it is easy to backup or to remove to a different webspace. I am so delighted!